Research Interview Guide Prompt Templates
AI prompt templates for research interviews. Design effective qualitative interview guides.
Overview
Qualitative interviews generate rich data, but only if you ask the right questions the right way. These prompts help you design interview guides that elicit deep responses, prepare probe questions, and adapt your approach for different participant types. They work for phenomenological interviews, grounded theory studies, narrative research, and applied qualitative projects.
Best Practices
Describe your research questions and theoretical framework so interview questions align with your goals
Specify your participant population since question wording should match their language and context
Mention your interview format including length, setting, and whether it's one-time or longitudinal
Note your qualitative approach because different traditions emphasize different question types
Include any sensitive topics that need careful handling
Prompt Templates
1. Interview Guide Creator
Create a semi-structured interview guide for my qualitative study. Research focus: - Topic: [WHAT YOU'RE STUDYING] - Research questions: [YOUR MAIN QUESTIONS] - Theoretical lens: [ANY FRAMEWORK GUIDING YOUR STUDY] Participant details: - Who: [DESCRIBE YOUR PARTICIPANTS] - Relationship to topic: [HOW THEY'RE CONNECTED TO WHAT YOU'RE STUDYING] - Sensitive considerations: [ANY DIFFICULT TOPICS] Interview parameters: - Length: [TARGET DURATION] - Format: [IN-PERSON/VIDEO/PHONE] - Approach: [PHENOMENOLOGICAL/GROUNDED THEORY/NARRATIVE/OTHER] Provide: 1. Opening questions to build rapport 2. Main questions organized by theme 3. Probe questions for each main question 4. Closing questions 5. Suggested order and transitions
Topic: First-generation college students' experiences with imposter syndrome. Questions: How do they experience it? How do they cope? What helps? Theoretical lens: Social identity theory. Participants: Juniors and seniors who are first-gen, recruited from student success office. Sensitive: Family relationships, academic struggles. Length: 60 minutes. Format: Video. Approach: Phenomenological.
INTERVIEW GUIDE: First-Generation Student Experiences Opening (5 min): 1. Tell me a little about yourself and your path to college. - Probe: What was the decision to attend college like for you? - Probe: How did your family react? (Purpose: Builds rapport, establishes background, eases into identity topics) Section 1: Belonging and Identity (15 min): 2. Can you describe a time when you felt like you really belonged at [university]? - Probe: What made that moment stand out? - Probe: How common are moments like that? 3. Now can you describe a time when you felt like you didn't quite fit in? - Probe: What was happening? Who was involved? - Probe: How did you feel in that moment? - Probe: What did you do? (Transition: 'You've described some experiences of fitting in and not fitting in. I want to ask about something related...') Section 2: Imposter Experiences (20 min): 4. Some students describe feeling like they don't deserve to be here, or like they'll be found out as not really belonging. Have you ever felt anything like that? - Probe: Can you walk me through a specific time? - Probe: What triggers those feelings for you? - Probe: How do those feelings affect what you do in class or on campus?...
Before you start interviewing. A good guide helps you get consistent data while staying flexible.
- •Pilot your guide with 2-3 people and revise based on what works
- •Memorize the guide so you can have a natural conversation instead of reading questions
2. Probe Question Generator
Generate probe questions for this main interview question: Main question: [YOUR QUESTION] Research focus: [WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO UNDERSTAND] Participant type: [WHO YOU'RE INTERVIEWING] Provide: 1. Follow-up probes if they give a brief answer 2. Deepening probes to get more detail 3. Clarifying probes when something is vague 4. Elaboration probes to explore related topics 5. Contrast probes to compare experiences
Main question: 'How has your relationship with your manager changed since you started working remotely?' Research focus: Understanding how remote work affects workplace relationships. Participants: Employees who transitioned from office to fully remote.
Brief Answer Probes (if they say 'It's fine' or give one sentence): - Can you say more about what you mean by 'fine'? - What's different now compared to before? - Walk me through a typical week of interactions with your manager. Deepening Probes (to get more detail): - You mentioned [specific thing]. Can you give me an example of that? - What does that look like in practice? - How did you feel when that happened? - What did you do next? Clarifying Probes (when something is vague): - When you say 'less connected,' what do you mean exactly? - Can you tell me more about what 'support' looks like for you? - You said things are 'harder now.' Harder in what way? Elaboration Probes (to explore related topics): - Has that affected how you think about your career here? - How does that compare to relationships with coworkers? - What would have to change for that relationship to improve? Contrast Probes (to compare experiences): - How is that different from when you worked in the office? - Is that the same with all your managers, or specific to this one? - How does your experience compare to what you hear from colleagues?
When developing your interview guide, or when a pilot interview reveals that certain questions need more probing.
- •Not every question needs every type of probe. Use judgment based on what you're hearing
- •Silence is also a probe. Sometimes the best follow-up is just waiting
3. Sensitive Topic Question Framer
Help me ask about this sensitive topic in a research interview: Topic: [THE SENSITIVE SUBJECT] Why I need to ask: [HOW IT RELATES TO YOUR RESEARCH] Participants: [WHO YOU'RE INTERVIEWING] Concerns: [WHAT MAKES THIS SENSITIVE FOR THEM] Provide: 1. How to frame or introduce the topic 2. Multiple question options from least to most direct 3. How to give participants an out if they're uncomfortable 4. What to say if they become emotional 5. How to transition away from the topic gracefully
Topic: Experiences with workplace discrimination. Why: Studying how marginalized groups handle corporate environments. Participants: Black professionals in predominantly white companies. Concerns: Re-traumatizing, professional risk if recognized, fatigue from always being asked to explain racism.
Framing the Topic: Before asking, acknowledge the weight of what you're asking. Something like: 'I want to ask about some experiences that might be difficult to talk about. I'm asking because your perspective is valuable for understanding what actually happens in these workplaces. Please share only what you're comfortable with, and we can skip anything or take a break whenever you need.' Question Options (indirect to direct): Least direct (allows them to choose what to share): - 'What's it been like for you working in environments where you might be one of few Black employees?' - 'How would you describe the culture around diversity at your company?' More direct (opens door but doesn't assume): - 'Have there been times when you felt your race affected how you were treated at work?' - 'Can you tell me about any experiences where you felt you were treated differently than your white colleagues?' Most direct (when they've already indicated they have experiences): - 'You mentioned [thing they said]. Can you walk me through what happened?' - 'What's the most difficult race-related situation you've handled at work?' Giving an Out: - 'If you'd rather not go into detail, you can just tell me generally what kind of situation it was.' - 'We don't have to talk about this if you don't want to.' - 'Would you like to skip this and come back to it later, or move on entirely?'...
When your research involves trauma, discrimination, illegal activity, health issues, or other sensitive subjects. Ethical interviewing requires thoughtful preparation.
- •Have resources available in case participants need support after the interview
- •Your IRB protocol should address how you'll handle distress
4. Interview Guide Adapter
Help me adapt my interview guide for a different participant type. Original guide designed for: [ORIGINAL PARTICIPANT TYPE] New participant type: [NEW PARTICIPANTS] Key differences: - [DIFFERENCE 1] - [DIFFERENCE 2] - [DIFFERENCE 3] Original questions: [PASTE KEY QUESTIONS FROM YOUR GUIDE] Provide: 1. Which questions work as-is 2. Which need rewording (with suggested rewording) 3. Which should be dropped for this group 4. What new questions might be needed 5. Any changes to order or flow
Original: Interview guide for teachers about implementing new curriculum. New: Administrators who supervise those teachers. Differences: Admins see implementation from above, may have mandated the curriculum, have different time pressures. Questions: (1) 'Walk me through how you implement the curriculum in your classroom.' (2) 'What challenges have you faced?' (3) 'How do you adapt it for your students?' (4) 'What support have you received?'
Question 1 - Needs Rewording: Original: 'Walk me through how you implement the curriculum in your classroom.' Revised: 'Walk me through how you've supported teachers in implementing the new curriculum.' Alternative: 'What does curriculum implementation look like from your vantage point?' Question 2 - Works with Minor Tweak: Original: 'What challenges have you faced?' Revised: 'What challenges have you observed or heard about in the implementation process?' Probe to add: 'What challenges have you faced in your role supporting implementation?' Question 3 - Drop or Substantially Revise: Original: 'How do you adapt it for your students?' This assumes classroom-level adaptation. For admins, consider: 'How have you handled requests from teachers to adapt the curriculum?' or 'What flexibility do teachers have in implementation?' Question 4 - Flip the Perspective: Original: 'What support have you received?' Revised: 'What support have you been able to provide to teachers?' and 'What support have you received from the district to help with this?' New Questions for Admins: - 'What went into the decision to adopt this curriculum?' - 'How do you assess whether implementation is going well?' - 'What pushback, if any, have you encountered?'...
When you're interviewing multiple stakeholder groups about the same topic. Each group needs questions appropriate to their perspective.
- •Consider the power dynamics between participant groups when analyzing their perspectives together
- •Same words may mean different things to different groups. Be alert to that in analysis
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Asking leading questions that suggest what answer you want. 'How stressful is your job?' assumes stress; 'How would you describe your typical workday?' is more open
Writing questions you'll read verbatim instead of guides for conversation. Good interviews are flexible
Including too many questions. You'll get better data from 10 questions explored deeply than 30 questions rushed through
Frequently Asked Questions
Qualitative interviews generate rich data, but only if you ask the right questions the right way. These prompts help you design interview guides that elicit deep responses, prepare probe questions, and adapt your approach for different participant types. They work for phenomenological interviews, grounded theory studies, narrative research, and applied qualitative projects.
Related Templates
Literature Review Prompt Templates
AI prompt templates for literature reviews. Synthesize sources and identify research gaps.
Research Summarization Prompt Templates
AI prompt templates for summarizing research. Extract key findings from academic papers.
Hypothesis Generation Prompt Templates
AI prompt templates for generating hypotheses. Develop testable research questions.
Have your own prompt to optimize?